Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/11101
Title: The Semiotic Approach to Jurisprudence: Can it make an original contribution? - Some brief reflections
Authors: Branco, Patrícia 
Issue Date: Dec-2006
Publisher: Centro de Estudos Sociais
Citation: Oficina do CES. 266 (2006).
Abstract: Legal semiotics offers a critical point of view and attempts a new approach to legal theory, based on a different kind of rationality which appeals to the construction of sense through narrative models, thus reaching the conclusion that there is no conceptual difference between law and fact. Hence, it aims to offer a fresh approach to legal theory, especially in what concerns the way of explaining decision-making and justification of legal decisions – whether the case is easy or hard. Working “ex post facto, legal jurisprudence seeks to provide an explanation of how meaning was actually created, not what meaning will or could be created”. By doing so, legal semiotics, returning to the private psychological processes in order to understand the sort of sense the decision makes, criticizes the legal syllogism as not being able to accurately account for all the deep structures in which legal discourse is embedded.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/11101
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FEUC- Vários
I&D CES - Vários

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
The Semiotic Approach to Jurisprudence.pdf147.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

156
checked on Oct 21, 2019

Download(s)

49
checked on Oct 21, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.